PACT
Attorneys: Answer soon on lawsuit
April 27, 2005
Story by Bret Yager
Siuslaw News
Florence, Oregon
People Against a Casino Town haven't given up yet, and with some
financial support, the group may outlast Governor Ted Kulongoski in its
bid to have a gaming compact with local tribes declared
unconstitutional.
That was the message from PACT attorneys at the groups' meeting this
week. Another message: Not too much longer now, folks.
"The federal judge is scheduled to hear the substance of the questions
in May," attorney Kelly Clark said. "That's why I say weeks or
short months, not a year."
The meeting came hard on the heels of a decision by the governor to
allow an off-reservation casino in Cascade
Locks. But PACT
attorneys are sure they have a precedent in several other cases that
have been decided around the country over the past years, in which
judges in places like New York,
Wisconsin and New Mexico have declared
that governors exceeded their authority by unilaterally entering into
gaming compacts with tribes.
Florence Events Center Audience 4/25/05
(PACT
Photo)
To hear the lawyers tell it, they have a few tricks up their sleeves
and things are looking good.
"This (particular lawsuit) isn't about casino closure," attorney Alexis
Johnson said. "This is about constitutional law. But if it
is decided that the governor lacked the power to enter into a compact,
that will be tantamount to a void act. That means no
compact. Then the first phone call is to the U.S. Attorney
General: shut her down."
"A little P.S. on that," Clark said. "There's a reason you don't
have bricks and mortar (a permanent casino structure) up there yet."
PACT Attorney Kelly Clark
speaks to audience
(PACT photo)
But attorneys admit an answer to whether Gov.
Ted
Kulongoski exceeded
his powers by signing a compact with the Confederated Tribes of the
Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians could take a while longer
yet.
They accuse Kulongoski of stonewalling, dragging the
lawsuit
into "a procedural thicket" and diverting it to federal court to answer
a question that they say is clearly a state issue.
The frustrating thing, Johnson said, is that the federal courts will
eventually remand the lawsuit back to state court, where it belongs and
where PACT wanted it tried in the first place.
"Their orders are to drag this thing out and no one is better at that
than the Oregon Department of Justice," he said. On the other
hand, "We're closer to a decision than we were a year ago. The
governor is running out of ways to bob and weaver."
He emphasized that PACT must stick around as long as the governor in
this war of attrition.
"Isn't there a time limit on this?" someone from the audience
asked. "I'll be dead before this is figured out."
Clark said a federal judge has the power to shift the lawsuit back to
the Oregon Supreme Court. "She can say, 'I don't have any way of
knowing what Oregon law is,'" Clark said. "We're looking at ways
to help the judge remember that she has that power."
Forcing Kulongoski to simply stand accountable in a court of law would
give the quickest answer, Johnson said.
"We have some things up our sleeves," he said. "We're working on
a statewide coalition to stand up and say 'I care about this.'
The people coming forward has been encouraging."
|